MBIS5014 Leading People in Digital Organisation

Assessment

Type: Portfolio
Assessment #: 1
Assessment Weighting: Portfolio of annotated bibliography on Leading People in Digital Organisation. (40%)

Alignment with Unit and Course

Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed:

• ULO01: Acquire knowledge of the traits, characteristics, and other attributes of successful leader-managers of digital organisations.
• ULO02: Acquire knowledge of, and ability to use, tools and techniques needed to analyse and solve typical and unusual problems faced by leaders in digital organisations.

Graduate Attributes Assessed:
GA 1: Communication
GA 2: Collaboration
GA 3: Research
GA 4: Critical Thinking
GA 5: Ethical Behaviour
GA 6: Flexibility

Due Date/Time

Online Moodle Submission in session 3 and session 6.

Due

Assessment weight

Task

Portfolio Part A (Session 3)

20%

Submit annotated bibliography of 4 journal articles in a single MS Word document

Portfolio Part B (Session 6)

20%

Submit annotated bibliography of 4 articles in a single MS Word document

Assessment Description

In this assessment, you will work individually. The topics for this assessment will be discussed during the lecture: therefore, it is vital that you attend the classes regularly.

You will develop a portfolio of annotated bibliographies covering the following topics (but not limited to):

1. Key Leadership Traits for Digital Transformation

• Traits of successful digital leaders (e.g., adaptability, vision, emotional intelligence).
• How leadership styles (transformational, agile, servant leadership) impact digital organisations.

2. The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Leading Digital Teams

• How emotional intelligence enhances leadership effectiveness in tech-driven environments.
• Case studies on leaders managing remote/hybrid digital teams.

3. Ethical Leadership in the Age of AI and Big Data

• Ethical dilemmas faced by digital leaders (privacy, bias in AI, data security).
• Frameworks for responsible decision-making in tech organisations.

4. Agile Leadership in Digital Organisations

• How agile methodologies influence leadership structures.
• Case studies on agile leaders in tech companies (e.g., Spotify, Amazon).

5. Change Management Strategies for Digital Transformation

• Kotter’s 8-step model vs. digital-specific frameworks.
• Overcoming resistance to change in tech adoption.

6. The Impact of Remote Work on Leadership Practices

• Best practices for leading distributed teams.
• Tools for maintaining engagement and productivity in virtual settings.

7. Innovation and Disruptive Leadership in Digital Ecosystems

• How leaders foster a culture of innovation.
• Examples of disruptive leadership in startups vs. established firms.

Check out the link provided to know about annotated bibliography: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0Hsnx0l1q4

You are encouraged to attend a workshop on Referencing and Research Practice organised by the Academic Success Team (AST). You may also schedule a one-on-one workshop with the AST by emailing [email protected].

The use of AI should only be undertaken if an assessment clearly states that it is permitted. Penalties will apply if AI is used intentionally without permission.

Detailed Submission Requirements

• Portfolio Part A and Part B must be submitted through separate Turnitin links on the Assessment 1 section of Moodle page for this unit.
• Each submission to be done using a MS Word document within a word count of 2500 words.
• Annotated bibliography of each journal article should follow the format provided in Table 1. Each submission should contain annotated bibliography of 4 peer-reviewed journal articles.

Table 1: Annotated Bibliography Template

• Title of article:
• Author(s):
• Journal title:
• Year of publication:
• Publisher:
• URL:
• Summary of article (Provide a summary of the main concepts discussed in article)
• Evaluation and reasons for use (Evaluate the quality of the article and its relevance to your topic using Five W’s: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPI7FVon29k)

Misconduct

• The assessment will be submitted through Turnitin via your unit page on Moodle.
• Turnitin is plagiarism software, which will identify if you have copied information and included it in your assessment.
• Copying information from others (i.e. websites, partner company information, or other students etc.) without the acknowledging the author is classified as misconduct.
• Engaging someone else to write any part of your assessment for you outside of the group work arrangement is classified as misconduct.
• To avoid being charged with Misconduct, students need to submit their own work and apply APA Style Referencing (ask your lecturer or the learning support coordinator ([email protected]) if you do not know what this means, or you need assistance applying it).
• The AIH misconduct policy and procedure can be read on the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/).
• Use the AIH referencing guide accessible via Library and Learning Support Page on Moodle.

Late Submission

• Any assessment submitted past the specific due date and time will be classified as Late.
• Any Late submission will be subject to a reduction of the mark allocated for the assessment item by 5% per day (or part thereof) of the total marks available for the assessment item. A 'day' for this purpose is defined as any day of the week including weekends. Assignments submitted later than one (1) week after the due date will not be accepted, unless special consideration is approved as per the formal process.

Special consideration

• Students whose ability to submit or attend an assessment item is affected by sickness, misadventure or other circumstances beyond their control, may be eligible for special consideration. No consideration is given when the condition or event is unrelated to the student's performance in a component of the assessment, or when it is considered not to be serious.
• Students applying for special consideration must submit the form within 3 days of the due date of the assessment item or exam.
• The form can be obtained from the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/) or on-campus at Reception.
• The request form must be submitted to Student Services. Supporting evidence should be attached. For further information please refer to the Student Assessment Policy and associated Procedure available on (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/).

Assessment 1 – Portfolio - Marking Rubric

Rubrics Criteria:

• ULO01: Acquire knowledge of the traits, characteristics, and other attributes of successful leader-managers of digital organisations.
• ULO02: Acquire knowledge of, and ability to use, tools and techniques needed to analyse and solve typical and unusual problems faced by leaders in digital organisations (100 marks)

Criteria

HD

D

C

P

F

Resources (60)

The portfolio demonstrates excellent summary of the resources with main points from articles are discussed and selected articles are highly relevant (51 – 60 marks)

The portfolio demonstrates very good summary of the resources with main points from articles are discussed and selected articles are very relevant (45 – 50.9 marks)

The portfolio demonstrates good summary of the resources with main points from articles are discussed and some selected articles are not relevant (39 – 44.9 marks)

The portfolio demonstrates satisfactory summary of the resources with main points from articles are discussed and some selected articles are not relevant (30 - 38.9 marks)

The portfolio demonstrates unsatisfactory summary of the resources and/or selected articles are not relevant (0 – 29.9 marks)

Evaluation of resources (20)

Excellent evaluation of resources using five W’s has been provided with proper justifications for choosing an article for the selected topic (17 – 20 marks)

Very good evaluation of resources using five W’s has been provided with justifications for choosing an article for the selected topic (15 – 16.9 marks)

Good evaluation of resources using five W’s has been provided with justifications for choosing an article for the selected topic (13 – 14.9 marks)

Satisfactory evaluation of resources using five W’s has been provided with justifications for choosing an article for the selected topic (10 – 12.9 marks)

Poor evaluation of resources using five W’s has been provided with no/shallow justifications for choosing an article for the selected topic (0 – 9.9 marks)

Writing (10)

Excellent (8.5 – 10 marks)

Very good (7.5 – 8.4 marks)

Good (6.5 – 7.4 marks)

Satisfactory. (5.0 - 6.4 marks)

Unsatisfactory. (0 – 4.9 marks)

Presentation (10)

Excellent (8.5 – 10 marks)

Very good (7.5 – 8.4 marks)

Good (6.5 – 7.4 marks)

Satisfactory. (5.0 - 6.4 marks)

Unsatisfactory. (0 – 4.9 marks)

Mark obtained

/100

Total Mark

/20