MBIS5011 Enterprise Systems

Assessment 1: Individual Portfolio

Assessment Overview

• Assessment Type: Individual Assessment
• Assessment Weighting: Portfolio - 40%

Portfolio Components & Tasks

Lab 1 (10%)

This lab focuses on foundational research about an Australian company named “BlueScope Steel Limited” (https://www.bluescope.com/).

Tasks:

1. Introduction: Write about BlueScope Steel's history, its business operations, and its global branches.
2. Organizational Structure: Propose a hierarchical structure with departments (silos) for the company. This can be a table or a diagram.
3. Management Levels: Decide if the company should have 2 or 3 management levels.
4. ERP Modules: Suggest 7 relevant ERP modules for BlueScope based on its business (e.g., Accounting module).

Output for Lab 1: This work should be saved in a Word document, which will form the beginning of your overall portfolio report.

Lab 2 (10%)

You will continue working on the document from Lab 1.

Tasks:

• Module Selection: Choose one of the 7 ERP modules you suggested in Lab 1 and build an SDLC for it. To do this, complete the following:
  • Analysis Phase (Functional Requirements):
    • Create a table detailing functional requirements for at least three different interfaces within your chosen module.
    • For example, if you chose an Accounting Module, you might define interfaces for accountants, an accounting manager, and high-level management, listing functions for each (e.g., add payment, calculate total, create payroll).
  • Design Phase (GUI):
    • Download and use justinmind.com software to build a Graphical User Interface (GUI) for one module (presumably the one you selected).
    • You need to create various interfaces, not including the log-in page.

Output for Lab 2: This section will be added to your ongoing Word document. It should include the table of functional requirements and screenshots or exports of your GUI design from Justinmind.

Lab 3 (10%)

This lab requires understanding BlueScope's steel production and designing a GUI for its Blast Furnace operations.

Before building the business processes, you need to read and understand how they produce the steel from the iron ore using the coking coal and limestone.(Include this in the document) BlueScope uses multiple types of energy to melt materials such as coke, electricity and natural Gas. Melting the materials is processed in an oven called “Blast Furnace”. Use ChatGPT and other internet resources to complete the following tasks:

Tasks:

1. Process Diagram:
   • Research how BlueScope produces steel from iron ore using coking coal and limestone, and the use of energy sources like coke, electricity, and natural gas in the Blast Furnace.
   • Draw a diagram illustrating the steps of receiving raw materials (Iron Ore, Coking Coal, etc.).
   • This diagram must show:
     • The companies who provide these materials such as “BHP”.
     • The warehouse that receives the tons of these materials.
     • The BF processes.
     • The outcome with in Australian products such as: COLOBOND, ZINCALUME, and TRUECORE.
     • The outcome of Structural steel and Hot-Rolled Product.
     • The distribution of the product to the wholesalers and distributors.
2. Blast Furnace Automation GUI:
   • Using Justinmind, build a GUI as part of an ERP to automate the Blast Furnace.
   • The interface must display key parameters for control, including but not limited to:Key Parameters to Control in a Blast Furnace (BF) at BlueScope Steel (BF6 at Port Kembla)
     To ensure efficient, high-quality steel production, several critical parameters must be monitored and controlled in the BF. [Copied from ChatGPT]
     1. Temperature Control
     2. Pressure & Airflow Control
     3. Raw Material Composition & Feed Rate
     4. Slag & Metal Chemistry
     5. Gas Composition & Efficiency
     6. Hearth Wear & Refractory Lining
     7. Environmental Controls

Output for Lab 3: This includes the process diagram and the GUI design (screenshots/exports from Justinmind) for the Blast Furnace automation. This will be added to your Word document. The user's note "the 3rd section most provide a report" means that the content from Labs 1, 2, and 3 will be compiled into the report format specified for the overall portfolio.

Lab 4 (10%)

This lab shifts to hands-on testing of applications within the odoo.com ERP platform.

Tasks:

• Application Setup: Use odoo.com and select the following applications:
  • Manufacturing
  • Project
  • Accounting
  • Timesheet
  • Studio
  • Employees
• Testing and Documentation:
  • Test each of the 7 chosen/listed applications.
  • For each application, you need to add new items (e.g., create a new project, add an employee, enter a timesheet, create a manufacturing order as shown in the example).
  • Capture at least three screenshots for each application to demonstrate the steps you've taken (e.g., one screenshot for item creation, one for a mid-process step, one for confirmation or a list view showing the new item). The example provided shows a manufacturing order with components.

Output for Lab 4: This section of your report will consist of the screenshots taken during the Odoo application testing, organized by application. You should briefly describe the steps shown in your screenshots.

Detailed Submission Requirements

• Online Moodle Submission via Turnitin.
• The assignment is to be written in a report format.
• The report should additionally, include an Executive Summary, Table of Contents, Introduction, Conclusion and References.
• Submitted as a PDF file through the Turnitin assignment submission tool on Moodle.
• Include a cover sheet that has your name, subject, date, report title and WORD COUNT.
• The assignment should not exceed 1000 words with a minimum of 900 words, excluding references.
• Use APA referencing including the reference list.
• Each student must submit the assessment through the Assessment 1 Turnitin link on the Moodle page for this unit.

Important Policies

Misconduct

• The assessment will be submitted through Turnitin via your unit page on Moodle.
• Turnitin is plagiarism software, which will identify if you have copied information and included it in your assessment.
• Copying information from others (i.e. websites, partner company information, or other students etc.) without the acknowledging the author is classified as misconduct.
• Engaging someone else to write any part of your assessment for you outside of the group work arrangement is classified as misconduct.
• To avoid being charged with Misconduct, students need to submit their own work and apply APA Style Referencing.
• The AIH misconduct policy and procedure can be read on the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/).
• Use the AIH referencing guide accessible via Library and Learning Support Page on Moodle.

Late Submission

• Any assessment submitted past the specific due date and time will be classified as Late.
• Any Late submission will be subject to a reduction of the mark allocated for the assessment item by 5% per day (or part thereof) of the total marks available for the assessment item. A 'day' for this purpose is defined as any day of the week including weekends.
• Assignments submitted later than one (1) week after the due date will not be accepted, unless special consideration is approved as per the formal process.

Special Consideration

• Students whose ability to submit or attend an assessment item is affected by sickness, misadventure or other circumstances beyond their control, may be eligible for special consideration.
• Students applying for special consideration must submit the form within 3 days of the due date of the assessment item or exam.
• The form can be obtained from the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/) or on-campus at Reception.
• The request form must be submitted to Student Services. Supporting evidence should be attached.

Rubric for Report (100% - Adjusted to 10%)

Requirements

Total

HD

D

C

P

F

Depth and Breadth of Coverage

50%

All aspects of key issues were investigated, identified, described, explained and demonstrated in depth.

Most aspects of key issues were investigated, identified, described, explained and demonstrated in depth.

Most aspects of key issues were investigated, identified, described, and explained adequately.

Basic aspects of key issues were investigated, identified, described, and explained adequately.

Responses were superficial and / or inadequately addressed the key issues.

Critical Elements

25%

The written work shows great depth of thought, excellent development of argument, logical analysis and insight into the subject.

The written work shows some evidence of analysis, supported by logical argument and insight into the subject.

The written work shows evidence of elementary analysis and the development of argument.

The written work is mainly descriptive, showing basic understanding of the topic.

The written work demonstrates limited understanding of the topic.

Structure, Language and Conventions

25%

All aspects of the written work conform to a high academic / professional standard.

Most aspects of the written work conform to a high academic / professional standard.

Most aspects of the written work conform to an acceptable academic / professional standard.

The written work displays basic structure.

The written work is not of an academic / professional standard.

Rubric for Portfolio (30%)

Requirements

Total

HD

D

C

P

F

Task Completion (This takes into account the time allotted to work on the task.)

15%

The task was completed according to the criteria.

The task was completed but needed minor modifications.

The task was completed but needed several minor modifications.

The task was completed but needed several major modifications.

The task was not completed.

Demonstrated Knowledge of Theory

15%

Student is able to identify and describe necessary steps for completion of the task.

Student is able to identify and describe necessary steps for completion of the task with minor assistance.

Student is able to identify and describe necessary steps for completion of the task with some assistance.

Student is able to identify and describe necessary steps for completion of the task with limited effectiveness.

Student does not identify and describe necessary steps for completion of the task.