Assessment 2: Report and Presentation
Assessment Overview
- Weighting: 30% (Part A- Report: 20% and Part B- Presentation: 10%) of unit total
- Due Date:
- Part A - Report on Week 6, Sunday, 9/11/2025, by 23:55 AEST/AEDT
- Part B - Presentation during your class in Weeks 6, 7
- Assessment Type: Group assessment
- Word Count / Length: 2500 words (Report: 1500 words, Presentation: equiv. 1000 words) +/- 10%
Unit Learning Outcomes
In this assessment, you will be tested on whether you have successfully met the following Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs):
- ULO1: Evaluate recent and emerging technologies in computer networking.
- ULO2: Propose possible applications of emergent technologies to enhance business outcomes.
- ULO3: Synthesise complex information and communicate this to both specialists and non-specialists.
Submission Type and Required Format
The type of assessment you will be completing: Part A is a Report, and Part B is an Oral Presentation.
For Part A: It should include the following:
- Assessment cover sheet.
- PDF or MS Word file.
- Information about reports can be found here on the Library and Learning Support website: Report
For Part B: It should include the following:
- Assessment cover sheet.
- PDF or MS PowerPoint file.
- Present in the Class of Week 6, 7.
- Information about presentations can be found here on the Library and Learning Support website: Presentations
Assessment Details
Assessment Purpose
The purpose of this assessment is to develop your ability to critically analyse an emerging network technology and communicate your findings through a professional report and group presentation. You will practise key skills in research, technical evaluation, teamwork, and public speaking—essential for roles in network design, technology consulting, and stakeholder communication in the ICT industry.
Assessment Instructions
In this assessment, you will need to complete the following steps:
Part A – Group Report
- Task Overview
Working in groups of a maximum of 3 members, research and write a professional report on an emerging network technology (A List of suggested topics will be posted as an announcement on Canvas). Your report should critically evaluate the technology, its applications, impacts, and concerns, using up-to-date industry and academic evidence. You may use AI tools with critical evaluation and proper acknowledgement. - What you need to include in your report
Section
Description
1. Introduction
Introduce the chosen emerging network technology. Briefly explain its relevance and why it was selected.
2. Technology Description
Provide a clear, technical explanation of how the technology works, including architecture, protocols, and innovations.
3. Comparison with Existing Technologies
Compare the emerging technology with an older or competing solution. Highlight advantages, limitations, and adoption considerations.
4. Impact and Concerns
Describe real-world or potential business applications of the technology. Critically evaluate the economic, social, environmental, and/or ethical impacts. Discuss risks or limitations.
5. Conclusion and Recommendations
Summarise your key findings and suggest whether/how the technology should be adopted or further developed.
6. References
Use APA 7th or IEEE referencing format, with at least 10–20 credible sources (academic and industry). Must use in-text citation.
- Collaboration Requirements
- Keep a shared log or outline to track each member’s contribution.
- Collaborate using cloud-based platforms (e.g., Google Docs, OneDrive).
- AI use must be declared in a short statement (see below).
Part B – Group Presentation
- Task Overview
Using the content from your group report, design and deliver a 15-minute group presentation, followed by a 5-minute Q&A session. Each member should actively participate. You may use presentation tools like PowerPoint, Canva, or Prezi. - What you need to include in your presentation
Slide Section
Description
1. Introduction
Briefly introduce the emerging technology and its relevance to industry and society.
2. Technology Description
Simplify key technical principles. Explain the protocols or standards involved. Use diagrams or animations to explain how it works. Focus on clarity and engagement.
3. Comparison
Use a table or visual matrix to compare with legacy or competing tech.
4. Impact and Concerns
Use visual aids (charts, icons) to present pros, cons, and implementation challenges.
5. Conclusion and Recommendations
Deliver strong key takeaways and your group’s position on the technology’s future.
6. References
Use APA 7th or IEEE format for (In-text citation and list). Provide the source (in-text citation) of any diagrams or tables. List your references at the end of your presentation.
- Presentation Requirements
- Time: 15 minutes + 5-minute Q&A
- Participation: Every member must present equally (5 minutes/member)
- Q&A: All members should be prepared to answer questions
- Submission: Upload slides to Canvas with your report Sunday, 9/11/2025, by 23:55 AEST/AEDT
- Evaluation: Presentation skills and engagement during Q&A will be assessed individually
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use
In this assessment, the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools is PERMITTED. AI can be only used in the initial stages of the assessment for brainstorming, generating ideas, clarifying concepts and creating structures. No AI content is allowed in the final submission. Students may continue to use spelling/grammar checkers (e.g. Microsoft spell-check) and referencing software. You CANNOT use AI tools to generate your full assessment.
Example tools might include:
- ChatGPT
- Grammarly
Students take full responsibility for the content of their assessments, and AI tools should be used as a supplement to your own research and analysis rather than as a replacement. If you use AI tools in an unethical or irresponsible manner, such as copying AI-generated output without checking it against reliable sources, you risk committing academic misconduct. Any use of AI must be appropriately acknowledged in the AI declaration on the Assessment Cover Sheet.
Refer to the Using AI page on the ECA Library and Learning Support website for further guidance.
Other Important Information
Assessment Resources
It is strongly recommended that you use the following to find academic peer-reviewed sources of information.
- ECA Library catalogue and databases
- Unit Readings (Course Reserves)
- Subject Guide: https://eca.libguides.com/IT
For in-text citation and referencing, follow the ECA HE Student Guide to APA 7th Referencing.
Submission Requirements
On completion of your assessment:
- Follow the Assessment Presentation Guidelines
- Submit your document as a PDF or MS Word document via the assessment submission link in Canvas.
- Include a completed Assessment Cover Sheet, including the AI Declaration, and attach it to the assessment.
- Save drafts of your work.
Assessment Support
- For academic support or feedback on a draft of your assessment, please email [email protected]
- For assistance with finding resources, such as books and journal articles, please email [email protected]
- For information and guides on tackling assessments and developing your academic skills, please visit in the ECA Library and Learning Support website: https://eca.libguides.com/
- For queries about this specific assessment task, please contact the Unit Coordinator.
Assessment 2 Rubric
Criteria (weighted as indicated below)
High Distinction (HD) 85-100
Distinction (D) 75-84
Credit (C) 65-74
Pass (P) 50-64
Fail (F) 0-49
Introduction (10%)
Strong rationale for topic selection; clearly establishes relevance and scope.
Well explained and relevant introduction.
Adequately introduces the topic; relevance is somewhat clear.
Basic or generic introduction; lacks a strong rationale.
Weak or missing introduction; relevance unclear.
Technology Description (10%)
Highly technical yet accessible explanation of architecture, protocols, and innovations; diagrams enhance clarity.
Clear and mostly accurate technical explanation; some use of diagrams.
Adequate technical detail; may lack depth or clarity.
Simplified or unclear explanation; lacks support visuals.
Confusing or incorrect description; lacks understanding of technical features.
Comparison with Existing Tech (10%)
Detailed and critical comparison; highlights adoption factors and trade-offs.
Effective comparison with relevant evaluation of features.
Comparison made, but may lack depth or nuance.
Basic or superficial comparison; lacks analysis.
Incomplete or unclear comparison; fails to evaluate relevance.
Impacts and Concerns (15%)
Critical and insightful evaluation of economic, ethical, and social implications; uses strong real-world examples.
Balanced analysis of benefits and risks; good examples provided.
Some impacts discussed; coverage may be uneven or general.
Limited or vague discussion; few real-world connections.
Lacks meaningful evaluation of impacts or risks.
Conclusion & Recommendations (10%)
Compelling summary and persuasive, evidence-based recommendation.
Logical summary with clear recommendation.
Basic summary with general recommendation.
Weak conclusion or unclear recommendation.
No clear takeaway or recommendation.
Referencing & Use of Sources (5%)
10–20 credible sources integrated fluently; consistent APA/IEEE format; AI support clearly acknowledged.
References mostly accurate and relevant; AI use declared.
Minimum references used; minor citation issues; limited AI disclosure.
Inconsistent citations or underuse of sources; vague AI attribution.
Few or inappropriate references; no AI attribution.
Group Presentation Content (10%)
Concise, relevant synthesis of report content; strong alignment with research; covers all key areas with clarity.
Well-structured content with minor omissions; clearly conveys main ideas.
Content covers main points; may miss depth or clarity in some areas.
Basic summary of report; superficial coverage of key points.
Content unclear, unfocused, or not linked to the report.
Group Visual Aids (10%)
Highly engaging and professional slides; visuals enhance understanding and audience engagement.
Visually effective and mostly well-integrated with content.
Adequate visuals; some slides are underdeveloped or inconsistently styled.
Limited or cluttered visual design; weak support for spoken content.
Poor or missing visuals; slides hinder understanding.
Individual Presentation Skills (10%)
Confident, engaging delivery with excellent pacing, posture, and voice; connects well with the audience.
Clear and professional delivery; minor voice/pacing issues.
Generally clear delivery; some inconsistencies in flow or confidence.
Basic delivery with evident nervousness or lack of polish.
Poor delivery; unclear, disengaging, or over-reliant on notes.
Individual Presentation Knowledge (10%)
Demonstrates expert understanding; answers Q&A fluently; expands on slide content accurately.
Good understanding shown; answers most questions confidently.
Reasonable knowledge; may struggle with deeper questions.
Vague or uncertain responses; minimal elaboration.
Lacks understanding; cannot explain content or respond meaningfully.